In the Name of Allâh, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful
Shaykh Muhammad Ibn Saalih Ibn 'Uthaymeen:
THE SAYING OF ALLAH'S MESSENGER sallAllahu 'alayhi wa
sallam, "EVERY BID'AH LEADS ASTRAY"
All Innovation is in the hell fire |
(They know that) when these three characteristics were all present in
his words, i.e., complete sincerity and good wishes, complete clarity and
eloquence and complete knowledge and understanding -then it is clear that what
he said was what he wanted to say in order to convey his desired meaning. So
(you should be amazed, that such a people, after recognizing all this) think
that bid'ah can be of three or five categories? Can this be correct? Never! And
what some scholars do claim is that there exists the good innovation. But if
this is so, then they can only be referring to two cases:
(i) that it is not an innovation but they do consider it to be one, or
(ii) it is an innovation, and hence it is something evil, but they do
not know of its evil.
(And these are the only two possibilities, bearing in mind that the
Prophet sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam said, "... every bid'ah leads
astray ...")
THE SHARP SWORD AGAINST THE PEOPLE OF INNOVATION
So for everything that is used to claim that there exists a good bid'ah,
then the answer for it is all the above. Thus there can be no room for the
People of Innovation to claim that their innovations are good while we have in
our hand the sharp sword that Allah's Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam
gave us - i.e., his saying that "... every innovation leads
astray." Indeed, this sharp sword was forged in the steel-works
of Prophethood and Messengership. It was not forged in some second rate
iron-mill, rather in the steelworks of the Prophet sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam
and he sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam forged it so eloquently, that anyone who
has the likes of this sharp sword in his hand would never be dumb-founded by
someone claiming that bid'ah is good, for the Messenger of Allah sallAllahu
'alayhi wa sallam said that, "...every bid'ah leads astray."
WHAT ABOUT THE SAYING OF 'UMAR radiAllahu 'anhu I AM
PLEASED WITH THAT BID'AH?
Now I can sense that there is in your hearts a creeping doubt saying,
'But what about the words of the Chief of the Believers 'Umar bin al-Khattab
radiAllahu 'anhu who succeeded in achieving something good when he ordered
Ubayy ibn Ka'b and Tameem ad-Daaree to lead the people in prayer during
Ramadaan. Hence he left having united the people behind a (single) Imaam, and
so said, "I am happy with this innovation, but the part of the night they
used to sleep through is better than the part they use to pray in."
[Reported by al-Bukhaaree, (Eng. trans. vol. 3, p. 126, no.227).]
The reply to this is from two angles. Firstly, it is not permitted for
anyone to oppose the saying of the Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam by
preferring the opinion of any other -be it the opinion of Abu Bakr who is
better than anyone else in this ummah after its Prophet, or that of 'Umar who
is the second best after its Prophet, or 'Uthmaan who is the third best after
its Prophet, or 'Alee who is the fourth best after its Prophet or that of
anyone else. As Allah, the Most High, says:
"So let
those who oppose his (Muhammad's sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam) command beware that
they will be afflicted with a trial or a painful punishment." (24: 63)
Imaam Ahmad rahimahullaah said, 'Do you know what the trial mentioned
here is? The trial is shirk - perhaps when someone opposes the Prophet's
saying, some deviation may affect his heart such that he will be destroyed.'
And Ibn Abbaas radiAllahu 'anhu said, 'Stones are about to be sent down from
the sky! I say that, 'Allah's Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam said so
and so ...' while you reply with what Aboo Bakr and 'Umar said!'
Secondly, we know for certain that 'Umar ibn al-Khattab radiAllahu 'anhu
was one of the strongest in glorifying the Words of Allah and His Messenger
sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam and he was famous for halting short of the limits
laid down by Allah, the Most High. To the extent that he was attributed with
being a warden and safe-guard of the Speech of Allah, the Most High.
And what about the story of that woman who opposed him, (assuming it is
authentic), when he wanted to limit the dowries, by an unknown amount? Then a
woman opposed him using the Saying of Allah, the Most High:
"And (even
if) you gave one of them a huge amount (of gold)." [4:20]
Hence 'Umar abandoned his wish to limit the dowries. However, the
authenticity of this story needs to be looked into. But the point is clear -
that 'Umar would safeguard the limits laid down by Allah, the Most High, and
would not transgress them. So it would not be befitting for 'Umar radiAllahu
'anhu being who he was, to oppose the words of the best of mankind, Muhammad
sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam by saying 'What a pleasing innovation about any
bid'ah. So can this innovation be that which Allah's Messenger was referring to
when he said that "... every innovation leads astray ..."?
No. Rather it can be said with certainity that this innovation about which
'Umar said, 'I am pleased with this innovation ...' falls outside what was
intended by Allah's Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam when he said, "...
every bid'ah leads astray." Thus when 'Umar said, 'I am pleased
with this innovation ...' he was referring to the effect - that the people had
gathered together behind one Imaam while before that, they were (praying) in
separate groups. And this praying (behind a single Imaam) during Ramadhan had
its origin from the Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam, as is proven from
that which is reported by al-Bukhaaree and Muslim from 'Aa'ishah, may Allah be
pleased with her, that the Prophet sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam led the people
in prayer for three nights and then hesitated doing so on the fourth night,
saying, "Indeed I feared that it would become obligatory upon you,
but you would not be able to cope with that." [Reported by
Bukhaaree (Eng. trans. vol.1, no.696) and Muslim (Eng. trans. vol.1, no.1666].
Thus performing the night prayer in Ramadaan as a single Jamaa'ah is
from the Sunnah of the Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam, and 'Umar radiAllahu
'anhu referred to it as a 'bid'ah' considering the fact that after the Prophet
sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam had left leading the prayer, the people became
separated such that one person would he praying alone, and elsewhere two would
be praying together, and somewhere else three would be praying in Jamaa'ah. So
throughout the mosque there were people praying alone and in groups, so 'Umar,
the chief of the Believers, had the idea - and this idea was perfectly correct
- to gather the people to pray behind a single Imaam. So this action was an
innovation in the sense that it was new and different to how the people were
before, i.e., praying in separate groups. Hence this bid'ah was relative and
subjective - not original and absolute, being set up by Umar radiAllahu 'anhu,
as this sunnah was there during the time of the Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa
sallam So it indeed was a Sunnah (not a bid'ah), which had been abandoned since
the time of the Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam, until Umar radiAllahu
'anhu revived it.
As a result of all this, it should never be possible for the People of
Innovation to use this saying of 'Umar as a way to condone their bid'ah.
AHKAAM AL-MAQAASID
Now someone could say: There are a number of innovated things that the
Muslims have approved of and acted upon that were not known of during the time
of the Prophet ~ Such as religious schools, compiling books and the like. These
innovations have been condoned by the Muslims and they have acted upon them and
considered them to be some of the most excellent ideas. So how can you
harmonise this - where the Muslims are almost unanimous in considering these
things to be good - with that saying of the Leader and Prophet of all the
Muslims, the Messenger of the Lord of the Worlds (Muhammad sallAllahu 'alayhi
wa sallam, where he sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam said, "..every
bid'ah leads astray."?
So in reply, we say that these things in these circumstances are not
innovations, rather they are a means towards achieving that which is already
from the sharee'ah. And these means will differ according to the location and
the time, but there are established rules for them. One such rule is that their
permissibility depends on the goal, i.e., those means that are used to achieve
a prescribed matter are themselves prescribed; those means that are used to
achieve something that is not ordained are themselves not ordained; and those
means used to achieve the forbidden are themselves forbidden. Even something
good maybe evil and forbidden if it necessarily leads to evil. Listen to Allah,
the Mighty and Glorious, when He says:
"Do not
insult those whom they call upon, instead of calling upon Allah, for they may
insult Allah out of hostility and ignorance" [6:108]
Yet cursing the gods of the mushriks is not wrong, rather it is correct
and quite proper. However, cursing the Lord of all the Worlds is indeed wrong,
improper, hostile and a transgression. Therefore, where this praiseworthy
insulting of the gods of the mushriks is a cause that leads to Allah being
insulted, then it becomes prohibited and forbidden. I have put this forward to
show that the means are according to their related goal. Hence regarding
schools, writing down knowledge and compiling books, then even though they are
innovations, in the sense that they were not found during the time of Prophet
sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam nevertheless they are not goals in themselves, but
are means, and the means are according to their goals. So, for example, if
someone were to set up a school to teach forbidden matters, then this act of
setting up the school woud be forbidden. If a person were to set up a school in
order to teach knowledge of the sharee'ah, then this act would be good and
sanctioned by Islaam.
WHAT ABOUT THE SAYING OF THE PROPHET sallAllahu
'alayhi wa sallam "WHOEVER ENACTS A GOOD SUNNAH ..."?
What if someone asks: How do you respond to what the Prophet sallAllahu
'alayhi wa sallam said i.e., "Whoever enacts a good sunnah
into Islam, he will get the reward of it and of all those who act upon it up to
the Day of Judgement," with the verb Sanna (i.e., 'enact')
meaning Shara'a i.e., to introduce or to prescribe?
The reply to this is: Who is the one who said, "Whoever
enacts a good sunnah into Islaam ...?" He is the same one who
also said, "... every bid'ah leads astray." It is
not possible for a phrase to emanate from someone who is truthful and proven to
be truthful, such that it would deny and negate another phrase of his, and it
is absolutely impossible for any speech of Allah's Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi
wa sallam to be self-contradictory, nor is it possible to refute any particular
meaning by claiming it to be contradictory. Whoever thinks that the words of Allah's
Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam are self-contradictory, then let him
look again, for indeed this kind of thought emanates from a person possessing
thoughts that are either deficient or limited. Indeed, it is completely
impossible that one would find a contradiction in the words of Allah, the Most High,
or that of His Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam.
If this is so, then it should be clear that the hadith, "...
every innovation leads astray ..."does not contradict the hadith "Whoever
enacts a good sunnah into Islaam ..." for the Prophet sallAllahu
'alayhi wa sallam said, "Whoever enacts a good sunnah into
Islaam...,"while innovations are not from Islaam. And he sallAllahu
'alayhi wa sallam said "... a good sunnah ..." while
innovation is not good. So he sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam made a distinction
between enacting a Sunnah on the one hand and enacting an innovation on the
other.
In any case, there is a reply that no one should have a problem with -
that the meaning of "Whoever enacts a sunnah ..." is,
'Whoever revives a sunnah that was present and then was lost.' Therefore, it
means that a matter has been revived, and thus in this way "... enacting a
sunnah ..."is relative and secondary just as (in the case of 'Umar, where
his use of) the word bid'ah (innovation) was relative and secondary in the
sense that it involved the
revival of a sunnah that had been abandoned.
There is even a second reply that can be given: That is the background
of the whole hadith, for it is a story concerning the tribe that came to see
the Prophet sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam while being in exceptionally difficult
circumstances. So the Prophet sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam urged that donations
be given to them, and hence one man form the Ansaar came forward with a bag of
silver in his hand which was almost too heavy for him to carry. He placed it
down before the Messenger sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam This made the face of
the Prophet sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam glow with joy and happiness and so he
said, "Whoever enacts a good sunnnah into Islaam will have the reward
of it and the reward of oil those who act upon it until the Day of
Resurrection." So we have here that the meaning of "
... enacting a sunnah ..." means to enact an action in the sense
of implementing it and not in the sense of setting up a new thing into the
sharee'ah. Hence the meaning of his sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam saying, "Whoever
enacts a good sunnah into Islaam ..." turns out to be, 'Whoever
acts upon a good sunnah in the sense of implementing it as opposed to
introducing a new thing in the sharee'ah,' for that would be prohibited as he
sallAllahu 'alayhi wa sallam said, "... every bid'ah leads
astray."
Courtesy Of: SunnahOnline.com
No comments:
Post a Comment